Medicare Rural Provisions

Medicare pays the bills that keep rural hospitals open. Rural residents skew older than urban populations, and rural hospitals derive 40 to 60 percent of revenue from Medicare. When Medicare payment policies change, rural healthcare feels the effects immediately and intensely.

Congress recognized this dependence decades ago and created special payment provisions designed to preserve rural healthcare access. Critical Access Hospitals receive cost-based reimbursement. Sole Community Hospitals receive payment protections based on historical costs. Rural Health Clinics receive enhanced reimbursement for primary care visits. Federally Qualified Health Centers receive prospective payment for comprehensive primary care. These provisions form the financial architecture that RHTP transformation must build upon.

Article 3A provides the operational briefing on how the CY 2026 payment environment and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s provisions interact with RHTP implementation. This article goes deeper. It documents the technical mechanics of each rural provider designation, their payment structures, their limitations, and how the specific CY 2026 payment changes affect each one. State RHTP directors need 3A’s strategic overview. State Medicaid directors, hospital CFOs, and transformation planners need what follows here.

Two realities frame everything in this article. First, RHTP cannot replace Medicare. The transformation program provides one-time investments while Medicare provides ongoing operational revenue. Second, these provisions are under constant political pressure. Cost-based reimbursement faces periodic challenges. Payment protections require congressional renewal. The foundation rural hospitals depend upon is not guaranteed, and several of its components now expire annually.

Critical Access Hospital Program

#

Designation and Purpose

#

The Critical Access Hospital designation emerged from crisis. More than 400 rural hospitals closed during the 1980s and early 1990s under Medicare’s prospective payment system, which paid fixed rates that low-volume facilities could not survive on. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 created the CAH designation and the Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Program: allow the smallest rural hospitals to receive cost-based payment, removing the financial penalty for serving small populations.

As of early 2026, approximately 1,377 Critical Access Hospitals operate across the United States, representing the majority of small rural hospitals.

Geographic requirements demand location more than 35 miles from another hospital (15 miles in mountainous terrain or areas with only secondary roads). Hospitals designated as “necessary providers” by their state before January 1, 2006, are exempt from distance requirements but must be located in rural areas. Size limitations cap capacity at 25 inpatient beds for acute care, with up to 10 additional beds each in distinct part rehabilitation and psychiatric units. Length of stay must average 96 hours or less annually. Emergency services must be available 24/7. State participation requires an established Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Program. Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, and Rhode Island have not established Flex programs and therefore have no CAHs.

Cost-Based Reimbursement: What It Actually Means

#

The defining benefit of CAH status is cost-based reimbursement at 101 percent of allowable costs for inpatient, outpatient, laboratory, therapy, and swing-bed services. The common misconception that Medicare simply reimburses whatever costs a CAH incurs is false.

Cost-based payment is not cost-plus payment. Medicare pays 101 percent of “reasonable and allowable costs” as determined through cost report settlement. Not all services qualify. Not all costs are deemed reasonable. The gap between actual costs and reimbursable costs can be substantial, particularly for services CMS determines are not medically necessary or for overhead allocations that exceed reasonable benchmarks.

Sequestration reduces effective payment. Federal budget sequestration, in effect since 2013, reduces CAH reimbursement by 2 percent, bringing effective payment to approximately 99 percent of allowable costs rather than 101 percent. Sequestration relief has been proposed repeatedly but faces budgetary offset requirements.

Coinsurance creates patient burden. Medicare beneficiaries pay coinsurance based on hospital charges, not costs. Because CAH charges often exceed costs significantly, beneficiaries can end up paying 40 to 60 percent of actual costs rather than the standard 20 percent. This creates financial barriers for the populations CAHs exist to serve and generates bad debt when patients cannot pay. Medicare reimburses only 65 percent of bad debt on Medicare patients, compounding the financial exposure.

CY 2026 Payment Context for CAHs

#

CAHs are insulated from many CY 2026 payment changes because their cost-based methodology operates outside the physician fee schedule and outpatient prospective payment system. The efficiency adjustment, the site-of-service PE revaluation, and site-neutral expansion do not directly affect CAH payment.

But insulation from rate changes does not mean insulation from the environment those changes create. Medicaid coverage contraction under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reduces the share of CAH patients with any coverage, increasing uncompensated care. SNAP cuts worsen the chronic conditions CAH patients present with, raising the costs that cost-based reimbursement must cover. Medicare Advantage penetration means a growing share of CAH Medicare patients are covered by plans that negotiate below cost-based rates, effectively undermining the CAH payment model for MA enrollees. Industry benchmark data shows MA plans paying CAHs approximately 95 percent of traditional Medicare rates, eroding the cost-based protection that justifies CAH status.

Swing Bed Services

#

CAHs can use swing beds to transition patients between acute care and skilled nursing care without physical transfer. Swing bed payment follows CAH cost-based methodology rather than the Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System. The HHS Office of Inspector General has estimated potential Medicare savings of $7.7 billion over six years from aligning CAH swing bed payments with SNF PPS rates. CMS has not concurred, recognizing that rural access concerns outweigh cost savings. But the OIG recommendation persists and represents ongoing policy risk.

Financial Reality

#

CAH status does not guarantee financial viability. The Flex Monitoring Team’s 2024 analysis showed total margins for rural CAHs ranging from negative 20.5 percent to positive 28.0 percent. One-third of rural hospital closures over the past decade involved Critical Access Hospitals. Cost-based payment covers Medicare costs but cannot generate sufficient revenue when total patient volume is inadequate. Fixed costs must be spread across whatever volume exists, and a CAH with declining admissions faces rising per-patient costs even with cost-based reimbursement.

Rural Emergency Hospital Program

#

The Rural Emergency Hospital designation, created by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 and effective January 1, 2023, represents the first new rural provider type since CAHs. REHs address a specific problem: what happens when a rural hospital cannot sustain inpatient services but the community still needs emergency and outpatient care.

As of early 2026, approximately 45 facilities have converted to REH status, with 19 conversions in 2023, 18 in 2024, and the remainder in 2025. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act expanded eligibility to include hospitals that operated between January 1, 2014, and December 26, 2020, but subsequently closed.

Payment Structure

#

REH payment includes two components creating more predictable revenue than volume-dependent hospital payment.

Outpatient services receive 105 percent of OPPS rates. The 5 percent premium compensates for rural cost differentials. With the CY 2026 OPPS update of 2.6 percent, REH outpatient payments increase accordingly. The monthly facility payment for 2025 was $285,625.90, with CY 2026 increasing by the hospital market basket percentage (approximately 3.3 percent before productivity adjustment), bringing the estimated 2026 payment to approximately $293,000 monthly or $3.5 million annually. This payment is uniform across all REHs regardless of size, location, or service volume.

REH payments were included in MA growth rate calculations beginning in CY 2026, a modest but symbolically significant acknowledgment of the designation’s place in the Medicare payment architecture.

Conversion Barriers and Patterns

#

Community resistance to losing inpatient services remains the primary obstacle. Local residents view conversion as failure rather than strategic adaptation. Loss of swing beds eliminates important revenue and service capability. 340B program revenue loss affects many converting hospitals. Financial modeling uncertainty persists because the designation is too new for long-term performance data.

Early patterns reveal disproportionate conversion in non-expansion states (approximately 66 percent of conversions despite representing 20 percent of states), among independent hospitals rather than system-affiliated facilities, and at hospitals with declining inpatient volumes before conversion. The designation captures facilities already losing inpatient viability.

Sole Community Hospitals and Medicare Dependent Hospitals

#

Sole Community Hospital Program

#

SCH designation applies to geographically isolated hospitals serving as the sole source of inpatient services. Requirements include location more than 35 miles from other like hospitals, or rural location with 25-35 miles distance and demonstration that no more than 25 percent of residents seek hospital care elsewhere.

SCHs receive payment protections based on a historical cost baseline: Medicare pays the higher of the federal PPS rate or a hospital-specific rate derived from historical costs. SCHs can also request volume decrease adjustments when discharge declines exceed 5 percent due to circumstances beyond their control.

CY 2026 significance: Rural SCHs received exemption from the site-neutral payment expansion to drug administration services. While off-campus hospital outpatient departments generally face a 60 percent payment reduction for drug administration under the new site-neutral policy, SCHs are protected in 2026. This exemption may not extend to future years.

Medicare Dependent Hospital Program

#

MDH designation applies to small rural hospitals heavily dependent on Medicare, requiring rural location, no more than 100 beds, at least 60 percent Medicare inpatient days or discharges, and no SCH classification. MDHs receive 75 percent of the difference between the federal PPS rate and their hospital-specific rate.

The One-Year Problem

#

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 extended both MDH enhanced payments and low-volume hospital adjustments through December 31, 2026 only. One year. Previous extensions had typically provided two or more years of certainty.

CMS has estimated that affected hospitals would lose approximately $500 million in annual payments if these programs expire. For individual MDH facilities, this can represent the difference between viability and closure. States building five-year RHTP transformation plans that assume MDH or low-volume payment continuity are building on a foundation that must be renewed annually through congressional action. This is not theoretical risk. It is the current operating reality.

Rural Health Clinic Program

#

More than 5,700 Rural Health Clinics operate across the United States, serving as the primary care backbone for rural communities that lack physician practices. RHC certification requires rural location in an area designated as a Health Professional Shortage Area or Medically Underserved Area, with at least one nurse practitioner or physician assistant on site at least 50 percent of operating hours.

Payment Structure

#

Medicare pays RHCs through an All-Inclusive Rate that bundles payment for a covered visit regardless of specific services provided. For CY 2026, the AIR payment limit increased to $165 per visit, up from $152 in 2025, an 8.6 percent increase. Provider-based RHCs in hospitals with fewer than 50 beds may receive higher rates based on historical costs.

CY 2026 Enhancements

#

Three new behavioral health integration billing codes allow RHCs to capture revenue for general behavioral health integration and psychiatric collaborative care model services when administered alongside primary care visits. These align directly with RHTP’s emphasis on integrated behavioral health but require billing infrastructure that many rural clinics have not yet built.

Virtual direct supervision was made permanent. CMS adopted the definition of direct supervision to include audio-visual telecommunications for all purposes, not just as a temporary pandemic measure. For RHCs where the supervising physician cannot be physically present at all times, this permanently removes a significant operational barrier.

RHCs may continue billing medical telehealth services and serving as distant site providers through December 31, 2027, under the CAA 2026 telehealth extension. This two-year window provides planning certainty for RHC telehealth investment but falls short of RHTP’s five-year timeline.

Federally Qualified Health Centers

#

FQHCs serve as the primary care safety net in both urban and rural settings, with approximately 1,400 organizations operating over 15,000 service delivery sites. In rural areas, FQHCs often function as the only source of comprehensive primary care, dental care, behavioral health, and enabling services like transportation assistance and case management.

Payment Structure

#

FQHCs receive a Prospective Payment System rate for each qualifying visit, adjusted for geographic variation. For CY 2026, the FQHC base rate increased to $207.72, with a 34.16 percent enhancement for new patient visits, annual wellness visits, and initial preventive physical examinations. This enhancement substantially improves revenue for patient acquisition and preventive care activities.

A separate care management payment at PFS rates became available in CY 2026, allowing FQHCs to bill for care coordination services independently of face-to-face visits. This is significant because care management is exactly the kind of activity RHTP emphasizes, and FQHCs previously could not capture dedicated revenue for it outside the bundled visit rate.

Workforce Pipeline

#

Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education (THCGME) received $225 million for FY2026 under the CAA 2026, with $25 million annual increases through FY2029 reaching $300 million by the end of the period. THCGME directly funds residency training at community health centers, producing physicians who are substantially more likely to practice in underserved areas than graduates of traditional residency programs.

CHC mandatory funding was extended one year under the CAA 2026, continuing the Section 330 appropriations that provide the base funding for FQHC operations. The one-year extension creates the same annual renewal uncertainty that affects other rural health provisions.

The CY 2026 Medicare Payment Landscape

#

Article 3A provides the state-director-level overview of CY 2026 payment changes. This section documents the technical mechanics that financial planners and provider administrators need.

Physician Fee Schedule: Dual Conversion Factors

#

For the first time, CMS implemented two separate conversion factors in CY 2026. Qualifying APM Participants receive $33.57 (3.77 percent increase from CY 2025). Non-qualifying practitioners receive $33.40 (3.26 percent increase). Both include the 2.5 percent statutory increase provided by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the first physician payment increase in five years.

Rural physicians disproportionately practice outside advanced APMs, meaning they receive the lower conversion factor. The gap is small in 2026 but will compound: QP conversion factors increase 0.75 percent annually while non-QP factors increase 0.25 percent. By 2030, the cumulative differential will create meaningful payment disparity rooted not in clinical quality but in the structural difficulty of building APM infrastructure in rural settings.

Physician Fee Schedule: The Efficiency Adjustment

#

CMS applied a negative 2.5 percent efficiency adjustment to work RVUs for non-time-based services, reasoning that procedural and diagnostic services accrue efficiencies over time with changes in medical practice. Exempt services include evaluation and management, care management, behavioral health, telehealth, and maternity care.

For rural practices that perform a high proportion of procedures and diagnostic services relative to E&M visits, the efficiency adjustment offsets most or all of the statutory increase. A rural surgeon whose practice is 70 percent procedural sees net payment change near zero. A rural family physician whose practice is 80 percent E&M sees the full 3.26 percent increase. The adjustment rewards the shift toward cognitive services while penalizing the procedural work that rural communities depend on because specialists are unavailable.

CMS will recalculate and reapply the efficiency adjustment every three years, meaning additional reductions are possible in 2029 within the RHTP window.

Physician Fee Schedule: Site-of-Service Revaluation

#

CMS reduced indirect practice expense allocation for facility-based services by 50 percent, increasing values for office-based settings. Services performed in hospital outpatient departments see total RVU reductions of approximately 7 to 10 percent for facility-based procedures.

CMS’s rationale assumes patients can choose between facility and office settings. Rural patients generally cannot. When the hospital outpatient department is the only available site for imaging, minor procedures, or infusion therapy, reducing its payment does not shift patients to lower-cost settings. It reduces revenue for the only setting that exists.

Hospital Outpatient Payment: Site-Neutral Expansion

#

The CY 2026 OPPS final rule expanded site-neutral payment to drug administration services at off-campus hospital outpatient departments, reducing payment from full OPPS rates to 40 percent of OPPS (equivalent to physician office rates). CMS estimates $290 million in Medicare savings in 2026, growing to $8 billion over ten years.

Rural Sole Community Hospitals received exemption in 2026. Critical Access Hospitals are unaffected because they receive cost-based reimbursement. But the policy trajectory points toward broader application. The Bipartisan Policy Center estimates comprehensive site-neutral payment could save $157 billion over ten years, a fiscal prize that makes expansion increasingly likely regardless of rural impact.

For non-exempt rural PPS hospitals operating chemotherapy infusion programs, rheumatology infusion services, or other drug administration through off-campus departments, the site-neutral reduction can overwhelm the general 2.6 percent OPPS update.

Remote Patient Monitoring and Chronic Care Management

#

CY 2026 introduced two new RPM billing codes (99445 for 2-15 days of data transmission and 99470 for the first 10 minutes of monitoring time), lowering barriers to RPM participation. Combined RPM and CCM billing can generate $140 to $200 per patient per month for rural practices with adequate infrastructure and patient volume.

This matters for RHTP because many states are investing transformation funds in remote monitoring platforms. The CY 2026 RPM codes create the revenue pathway those platforms need to sustain operations after RHTP funding ends. However, providers who subsequently participate in the ACCESS CMMI model face a different payment structure ($35 per month with 50 percent withhold) that may be less than what standalone RPM/CCM billing generates. Article 4F examines this tension in detail.

Medicare Advantage in Rural Markets

#

Penetration and Dependence

#

Medicare Advantage enrollment in rural areas has grown fourfold since 2010, with MA plans now enrolling a majority of all Medicare beneficiaries in many rural counties. This is no longer supplementary coverage. In counties where MA penetration exceeds 50 percent, it is the dominant payer for the Medicare population.

MA plans are not required to pay cost-based rates to CAHs, enhanced rates to SCHs, or AIR rates to RHCs. They negotiate reimbursement like commercial payers, eliminating the financial protections that Medicare fee-for-service provides. The AHA reports rural providers receive an average of 10 percent less from MA plans than from traditional Medicare, with MDHs and low-volume hospitals experiencing 15 percent shortfalls. Limited competition among MA plans in rural markets (often one or two plan options) weakens hospital bargaining power.

CY 2026 and CY 2027 Rate Environment

#

CY 2026 was generous: a 5.06 percent payment increase totaling approximately $25 billion in additional plan revenue, completing the three-year phase-in of the 2024 CMS-HCC risk adjustment model. The coding pattern adjustment of 5.9 percent partially offsets gains.

CY 2027 proposes near-zero growth. The January 26, 2026 Advance Notice indicates a 0.09 percent average payment update, essentially flat. CMS also proposes excluding diagnoses from unlinked chart review records and from audio-only services from risk adjustment, with combined impact of approximately negative 1.5 percent on plan risk scores.

For rural providers, the 2026-2027 trajectory matters because MA plan generosity to providers follows MA plan revenue. A 5 percent plan payment increase in 2026 does not automatically flow through to provider contracts, but it creates capacity for rate increases. A flat 2027 update eliminates that capacity. Rural hospitals negotiating multi-year MA contracts in 2026 should account for the possibility that plan willingness to negotiate favorable terms deteriorates as plan revenue growth stalls.

Network Adequacy

#

CMS network adequacy standards require MA plans to maintain provider networks within 60 miles or 75 minutes in rural counties. These standards measure presence, not capacity. A plan that contracts with one physician 55 miles away meets the standard regardless of whether that physician has appointment availability within medically appropriate timeframes.

Prior Authorization Burden

#

Nearly four in five rural clinicians report significant increases in prior authorization burdens over the past five years, with 86 percent reporting negative impacts on care delivery. MA patients stay approximately 10 percent longer in rural hospitals than clinically similar traditional Medicare patients before discharge to post-acute settings, driven by plan coverage disputes and inadequate post-acute networks.

The Extender Economy

#

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 (H.R. 7148), signed February 3, 2026, renewed a package of rural health payment protections. The protections matter. Their duration matters more.

Telehealth flexibilities: through December 31, 2027. Geographic restrictions lifted, originating site requirements waived, audio-only permitted, FQHCs and RHCs authorized as distant site providers. Two years, not five. States building five-year telehealth strategies on authorities that expire in two years are making assumptions about congressional behavior that experience does not support.

Low-volume hospital adjustments: through December 31, 2026. One year. Enhanced inpatient payments for hospitals in sparsely populated areas where volume cannot support standard reimbursement.

Medicare Dependent Hospital program: through December 31, 2026. One year. The same annual uncertainty applies.

Ambulance add-on payments: through December 31, 2027. Rural ambulance services receive a 3 percent add-on (22.6 percent for super-rural areas). Two years for services operating on margins where a 3 percent reduction could trigger closure.

DSH cut moratorium: through September 30, 2027/2028. Disproportionate share hospital payments that subsidize care for uninsured patients continue without ACA-scheduled reductions. Critical for safety-net hospitals in non-expansion states.

Hospital-at-home waiver: through September 30, 2030. Five years. The only extension matching RHTP’s timeline. Over 400 hospitals use these waivers for acute-level home-based care.

Community health center mandatory funding: one year. THCGME receives $225 million for FY2026 with $25 million annual increases through FY2029.

Rural program appropriations: $70.3 million for the Rural Hospital Flexibility Program, $145 million for Rural Communities Opioid Response, $14 million for Rural Residency Planning and Development, $15 million for Rural Hospital Maternity and Obstetrics Management. New maternity care cost reporting requirements for rural hospitals come with $10 million in implementation grants.

The pattern is the problem. One-year and two-year extensions create legislative dependency that makes long-term planning impossible. Rural health payment is not a policy framework. It is a pattern of repeated last-minute rescues that prevents closure today while making sustainable planning for tomorrow impossible. States cannot recruit physicians on annual payment commitments. They cannot build telehealth programs on two-year authorities. They cannot plan five-year transformation on one-year foundations.

RHTP directors should assume that some extensions will lapse during the program window and build contingency plans for operations without them. If extensions continue, the contingency was unnecessary. If they lapse, the contingency saves transformation from collapse.

Telehealth and Rural Medicare

#

Current Authorities (Through December 31, 2027)

#

Under the CAA 2026 extension, Medicare telehealth operates with pandemic-era flexibilities through December 2027. Geographic restrictions are lifted. Originating site requirements are waived. Audio-only is permitted for established patient relationships. FQHCs and RHCs serve as both originating and distant sites. Virtual direct supervision was made permanent in the CY 2026 PFS, meaning one critical telehealth enabler no longer depends on annual renewal.

The mental health in-person requirement was delayed to January 1, 2028, extending the period during which behavioral health telehealth can operate without a preceding in-person visit. This provides two years of telehealth-first behavioral health access, aligning with RHTP’s behavioral health integration emphasis.

The Audio-Only Risk

#

The CY 2027 MA Advance Notice proposes excluding diagnoses from audio-only services from risk adjustment. If finalized, this would reduce MA plan risk scores for rural beneficiaries whose primary remote care modality is audio-only telephone visits. Plans receiving lower risk-adjusted payments for audio-only patients have reduced financial incentive to maintain audio-only access. For rural communities where broadband limitations make video telehealth unreliable, this creates a potential access reduction driven by payment policy rather than clinical judgment.

RHTP Telehealth Investment Risk

#

RHTP explicitly authorizes telehealth infrastructure investments. States may invest in equipment, connectivity, platforms, training, and consumer-facing applications. These investments depend on continued Medicare coverage of telehealth services. RHTP can fund infrastructure, but providers need ongoing reimbursement to sustain telehealth operations. The December 2027 expiration creates a hard deadline: telehealth infrastructure built with RHTP funds in Years 1-2 faces potential revenue loss in Year 3 if Congress does not extend again.

CMMI Models and Rural Medicare Payment

#

Article 3A introduces the CMMI model wave. Article 4F provides deep analysis. This section notes only the intersection with Medicare rural payment designations.

ACCESS (outcome-aligned chronic disease management) serves FFS Medicare only. CAHs, RHCs, and FQHCs can participate, but their existing payment mechanisms interact unpredictably with ACCESS payment. A CAH billing cost-based for a beneficiary who is simultaneously aligned to an ACCESS participant faces questions about how cost-based reimbursement and outcome-conditioned payment coexist. CMS guidance on this interaction remains limited.

LEAD (accountable care for small/independent/rural practices) explicitly targets the practices that operate as or within RHCs. If LEAD succeeds in bringing rural primary care into accountable care arrangements, RHC payment mechanics may need to evolve to accommodate shared savings or risk-bearing participation.

The operational question for RHTP is whether states should actively facilitate provider participation in these models as a sustainability strategy, connecting RHTP-funded infrastructure to CMMI payment pathways. Article 5E examines the federal-state coordination gap that makes this integration the state’s responsibility.

RHTP Interaction with Medicare Provisions

#

The Foundation Question

#

RHTP operates on top of the Medicare foundation. The program provides one-time investments to strengthen infrastructure that Medicare payments must subsequently sustain. Successful RHTP implementation requires understanding how transformation investments interact with Medicare payment, both as it exists today and as it may change during the five-year window.

Workforce investments increase hospital costs. If those costs are allowable under CAH cost-based methodology, Medicare covers the increase. If not, the hospital absorbs the cost after RHTP funds expire.

Telehealth infrastructure generates revenue only if Medicare covers telehealth services at adequate rates through adequate authorities. RHTP funds the equipment. Medicare determines whether using that equipment pays.

Care coordination improvements may reduce hospitalizations. Under value-based arrangements, this benefits providers. Under fee-for-service, reduced volume means reduced revenue, potentially undermining the financial case for transformation.

Designation Strategy

#

States and hospitals should consider Medicare designation strategy as part of RHTP planning. CAH conversion may benefit PPS hospitals struggling with low volumes and high Medicare shares. REH conversion may suit facilities that cannot sustain inpatient services. Maintaining existing designations may be optimal where current provisions provide adequate support.

Payment Adequacy Assumptions

#

RHTP applications typically assume continued Medicare payment at current levels. This assumption has a defined expiration date for multiple programs and faces structural erosion through MA penetration, sequestration, and potential changes to cost-based reimbursement. States should conduct sensitivity analysis examining how transformation strategies perform under scenarios where MDH payment, low-volume adjustments, telehealth flexibilities, or ambulance add-ons expire during the RHTP window.

Appendix: Key Medicare Rural Program Parameters (CY 2026)

#